Kitchen, Dining Room and Living Room Question
Question
We are busy decorating our house. Now we have. House where the kitchen, dining room and living room are separately set up but have open passage. You will also look from the living room through the dining room through to the kitchen. By walls is shaped as true as two brackets: [].
The dimensions of the room are 4.5 to 4. We want a dresser against a wall of 210x80x45. Now, we would like in the middle of the room a large dining table with 6stoelen (with armrest). We are dubbing between 220 x 100 and 240 x 110. What do you think the best is proportionate? Living room is slightly larger than dining and kitchen area approximately equal to. The passage between rooms is nearly 2 meters wide.
Answer
Congratulations on your home! Exciting also to make good choices for your décor. I like to think along with you. If I understand correctly you want the elongated wall of the dining room and a dresser in the middle, parallel to the dresser, a long dining table?
For a dresser should you take into account a minimum clearance of 66 cm for the cabinet doors / drawers to have open and to stand for. Would you put something in the bottom of the dresser and you need to squat then you need a minimum space of 71 cm. The walkway runs along the sideboard or along the table to the kitchen and the living room? For the table you need a space around of at least 45 cm from the table edge if someone is sitting at the table.
Would you can still walk behind while someone is sitting at the table then you need a space of 85 cm around. If the dresser against the wall of 4.5 meters is you have to take into account the depth of the dresser: 45 cm + 71 cm squat space = 126 cm. The smallest table needs a space of 100 (table width) + 2 x 80 cm sitting and walking space = 260 cm. Together you need a width of 126 cm + 260 = 386. you love than 14 cm in width about. The larger table you need a width of 110 + 2 x 80 cm = 270. You will love the total width about 4 cm.
In your case, I would for the table of 220 x 100 to go.
A chair with armrests has more space in the width of the table than a chair without armrests and sometimes you can not slide the seat all the way under the table so you can lose even more room for the chair. You also have more space left and right of the seat need to get out of the chair, you must indeed with your body over the railing. A chair with armrests also looks massive but it is comfortable.
You ask what I think the best is disproportionate. Symmetry provides a space in peace and balance. Suppose the table parallel to the dresser then it is best if these are equal. The sideboard is shorter than the table. Optically, you could "extend" the dresser for example a plant or image to put down beside the dresser so it looks like the table and sideboard and plant are of equal length. Note: For only a walkway, you need 70 cm space.
Would you let the whole less massive eyes, you can also opt for an open dresser without cabinet doors. The higher the chairs and sideboard stands on legs, the more you look beneath the space, making the floor again look bigger.
It's about :
Blogger Comment
Facebook Comment